ISABEL VINCENT

Isabel Vincent author and journalist recent published work.

Recent Posts

  • HILL SQUEEZES SERBS by Isabel Vincent staff for the New York Post
  • IRAQ BLOCKING 'LOOT' AUCTION
  • IT'S CHARITY H'WOOD STYLE: A LOOK AT THE BOOKS OF 10 'CAUSE' CELEBS
  • "CASH COW" TRICKY CHARLIE'S CARIB HIDEAWAY, SHADY FILINGS ON BEACH-VILLA RENTAL INCOME: Exclusive by Isabel Vincent in Punta Cana, Dominican Republic (Staff for the New York Post)
  • BAR FIGHTER HIDING OUT IN SERBIA
  • Rev. AL Sharpton Soaks Up Boycott Bucks EXCLUSIVE by Isabel Vincent staff for the New York Post
  • STINGS 'WASTE FOREST' by Isabel Vincent staff for the New York Post
  • FIDEL STEPS DOWN by Isabel Vincent
  • TIME/CNN: Caribbean AIDS Hot Spot
  • TIME/CNN: Monkey Advocate

About

My Photo
Subscribe to this blog's feed
Blog powered by TypePad

Archives

  • March 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • March 2008
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
Add me to your TypePad People list

IT'S CHARITY H'WOOD STYLE: A LOOK AT THE BOOKS OF 10 'CAUSE' CELEBS

BY ISABEL VINCENT STAFF FOR THE NEW YORK POST 9 Nov 2008


THEY have good looks, but they could use some serious help straightening out their books.

George Clooney, Bono, Wyclef Jean, Petra Nemcova and a half-dozen other celebs have founded charities that have some eyebrow-raising business practices, The Post uncovered in a sweeping review.

Jean's charity to help Haitians has failed to file tax returns for eight years. Bono's mega-foundation chartered a plane to Africa and bought tickets for a U2 concert.

Poker lover George Clooney took in donations from a dubious online card-games company. And Giant Super Bowl hero Osi Umenyiora has dropped the ball when it comes to even registering his charity to benefit Africa and research into Alzheimer's disease.

"You need to have people managing the organization that are well versed in the letter of the law," said Bennett Weiner, chief operating officer of the Better Business Bureau's Wise Giving Alliance. "Just because a celebrity is associated with a charity doesn't mean they are doing any of this."

Here are 10 celeb charities that raised red flags, according to a Post examination of federal tax forms and other records.

1.) Yele Haiti (Wyclef Jean Foundation)

Former Fugees member Wyclef Jean's charity aims to address educational, environmental and emergency-relief issues in his native Haiti. It has a slick Web site and financial support from Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie but has not filed a US tax form since 2000. An insider at the charity told The Post that where the money goes in Haiti is a mystery, or if part of the haul went to purchase a television station in Port-au-Prince. Charity President Hugh Locke said, "We are in arrears in our filing." He said that large donations go directly to projects in Haiti, where the organization is registered as a charity. He said the missing IRS documents would be filed by the end of the year. The forms are required to allow them to receive donations that can be tax deductible and to avoid paying taxes on their donations. The charity also has not completed the required New York state registration, according to Attorney General's Office records. Meanwhile, Jean owes the state of New Jersey $183,172 in personal income tax, a sum Jean's spokesman said last month the singer was in the process of paying.

2.) George Clooney's Not On Our Watch

The "Ocean's Eleven" star leads the Hollywood outcry against genocide in Darfur. His group also provides humanitarian aid and raises awareness of human-rights issues in Sudan and Burma. But Clooney's charity, which lists Don Cheadle and Matt Damon as founders, has a contractual relationship with an offshore company that conducts poker games on the Internet to raise funds for the charity. The company, Rational Services Limited, is incorporated on the Isle of Man, off the coast of England. Such companies operate in a legal gray area. In registration documents filed last year with the New York attorney general, Not On Our Watch requested its contract with the gaming company "not be subject to public inspection." Although the AG does not require such information, one expert on charities and IRS law said he had never seen a tax-exempt organization list an offshore gambling enterprise as a donor. The charity's executive director, Alex Wagner, would not reveal the nature of the relationship with Rational Services Limited, other than to say it donated $1 million to Not On Our Watch. "They were very generous to us and gave us a donation that has gone on to do a lot of good in Darfur," Wagner said.

3.) Osi Umenyiora's Make Plays for Africa, Strike 4 a Cure

The Giant star defensive end started a foundation called Make Plays for Africa and a sister group, Strike 4 a Cure, to raise money for research into AIDS and Alzheimer's disease two years ago. But their annual celebrity bowling tournaments were financial failures, and it came to light in news reports last summer that the groups did not have tax-exempt status, as it claimed. Umenyiora's brother, Jim, director of Make Plays for Africa, has said he would cancel further events and shut down the Web site. Until recently, however, Umenyiora's personal Web site solicited "sponsorship packages" for Strike 4 a Cure, and the charity's Web site still solicits donations. The Make Plays for Africa site has been shut down. Umenyiora's manager did not return calls for comment.

4.) Tyra Banks' TZONE Foundation

The supermodel and talk-show host recently set up this Los Angeles-based organization to help disadvantaged teenage girls - starting with running "self-esteem camps," then shifting focus to funding other groups that empower young women. But in 2006, the group blew more cash on salaries and internal costs ($34,611) than it gave out in grants to community groups ($31,900). Meanwhile, it listed a questionable expense of $4,255 as "benefits paid to or for members" on its tax forms. The charity said that it was in a transition period in 2006 and that the $4,255 benefits expense was misidentified on the form and was actually money for employee benefits.

5.) Bono's DATA (Debt, AIDS, Trade, Africa) Foundation

The U2 frontman lends his megawatt star power to this advocacy group to help bring an end to AIDS and poverty in Africa. The Washington, DC-based group - now known as One - took in an eye-popping $31 million in 2006 but spent just $6 million on its work. Among its outrageous expenses were a $272,700 bill to charter a plane, a $117,838 tab for "transportation and security" and $8,740 for U2 tour tickets. Kathy McKiernan, a spokeswoman for Bono's organization, said the group chartered the 737 to fly journalists and others on a 10-day "learning and awareness-raising trip" to seven African countries in May 2006. DATA was reimbursed for the majority of the costs from the media, she said. "Our policy is to take security and a camera crew to shoot video for use in our advocacy work with us on all Africa trips we do," she added. She said the concert tickets were distributed to DATA's supporters and elected representatives in Washington. McKiernan said the lawmakers were asked to reimburse the charity if the ticket price was more than $50, to comply with congressional ethics rules. Most of the $31 million raised was in grant form and will be paid over several years, with just $8 million coming in 2006, McKiernan said. Bono has never disclosed how much he gives to his own charity, but McKiernan said the rock star covers all of his own travel-related expenses.

6.) Petra Nemcova's Happy Hearts Fund

After surviving the 2004 tsunami in Thailand by clinging to the top of a palm tree, the supermodel wanted to pay it forward by founding a charity to build schools in Latin America and Indonesia. Instead, it seems an outrageous portion of the donations have gone for lavish parties at Cipriani. Bruce Willis, Uma Thurman and Eva Mendes have attended the black-tie affairs. According to the most recent tax filing, for 2006, the organization spent more than half of its funds on administration and fund raising, including its annual star-studded Heart of Gold ball, and gave nothing in aid. Glen Nordlinger, a director of Happy Hearts Fund, said the group raised $4.5 million in 2007 and spent $2.1 million on programs, including building schools - though the charity has not filed its 2007 paperwork yet. But even those figures raise red flags with charity watchdog groups, which use the almost universal standard that a well-run charity should spend 65 to 75 percent of its donations helping people. Still, in November, Happy Hearts will host a Masquerade in Venice dinner at Cipriani Wall Street and will honor "His Excellency" Wyclef Jean, according to the invitation.

7.) Larry King Cardiac Foundation

The CNN talk-show host and heart-attack survivor raises funds for heart operations for poor patients. But the charity spent $2.3 million on salaries, supplies, advertising, program expenses and gala dinners in LA and Washington, DC, in 2006, much more than the industry standard of 10% for fund-raising. Meanwhile, King employs his son, Larry King Jr., as the organization's CEO at a $200,000 salary - a hefty raise from the $66,667 he was paid when first appointed in 2004. Junior's current salary blows away the standard 3 percent of total expenses recommended as the ceiling for a CEO salary. Family members on charity boards are also a red flag. "I'm afraid that this just doesn't pass the smell test," said Sandra Miniutti, vice president of marketing for Charity Navigator, a leading charity watchdog group. King Jr., 46, said that the charity has only three employees and that he wears many hats. "I am not your typical CEO or president," he said. "I do everything, and I agreed to take this on because I really wanted to help my father." The group didn't respond to requests for financial information from the charity division of the Better Business Bureau, which asked for it after receiving calls from potential donors who wanted more details on the organization.

8.) Gary Payton Foundation

The retired Seattle SuperSonics point guard established this Seattle-based charity to give out scholarships to needy children. But the organization gave out only $12,937 - while it spent $101,620 on management and administration in 2006. It spent more than half of its donations on the salary of its executive director - $65,000 - that year. A spokesman for the charity would not comment.

9.) Dyan Cannon's Operation Outlook

The aging actress is the "international executive spokesperson" of this Everett, Wash.-based group that tries to find runaways and missing children. The charity spends 68 percent of its $2.4 million budget on its relentless telephone solicitations - but workers have been accused of posing as representatives of a better-known child-finding agency to raise funds. The accusations say phone solicitors misrepresented the group in telephone solicitations as the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, a highly regarded charity. "One overanxious caller can make statements like that, and we just can't be responsible for everything," said a spokeswoman for Operation Outlook. The charity has also rebuffed repeated requests to provide its financial information to the Better Business Bureau.

10.) Magic Johnson Foundation

The retired basketball legend raises AIDS awareness and helps patients. But the group has spent large amounts on administrative costs ($712,825 in 2006) that are almost equal to the amount it gives to the cause ($714,029). The foundation's president, Towalame Austin, acknowledged the issue and said the group had looked to reorganize. She said new filings should reflect a turnaround in the amount going to the needy.

November 25, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink

"CASH COW" TRICKY CHARLIE'S CARIB HIDEAWAY, SHADY FILINGS ON BEACH-VILLA RENTAL INCOME: Exclusive by Isabel Vincent in Punta Cana, Dominican Republic (Staff for the New York Post)

CashCow For 20 years, Harlem Rep. Charles Rangel has owned a beachfront villa in a sun-drenched Dominican Republic resort, yet has only sporadically declared income on the property in federal filings.


While the villa was rented to paying guests for the past two years, for instance, Rangel reported no income from it in 2006 and 2007, The Post has learned. As a congressman, failure to fully list all income and investments can result in civil penalties or criminal charges.

The powerful Ways and Means Committee chairman, a Democrat, owns "casita" No. 412 on the Caribbean Sea at the Punta Cana Hotel, on the lush eastern tip of the country, where he is affectionately known as "el senador."

His three-bedroom, three-bath villa, which can accommodate three couples, is rented for between $500 in the low season to $1,100 a night in the busiest tourist season and is one of the resort's most popular, managers and staff say.

"You are requesting the best casita on the beach," a reservations manager told a Post reporter posing as a customer.

"We are always booked solid on that one between December 15 and April 15. It is always the first one to go," he said.

The 78-year-old Rangel's stone-covered cottage - which boasts flat-screen TVs and a panoramic ocean view - was open to hotel guests in the past two years, General Manager Carolina Jones told The Post.

"It's part of the hotel operation. It's available to customers at all times," Jones said of No. 412. Typically, the owners of the casitas earn 80 percent of any rental income, staff said.

But Rangel's financial disclosure forms, which members of Congress must file annually to the clerk of the House of Representatives, checks "none" for income from the property in 2006 and 2007.

"I have not received any rental income," Rangel said when asked about the villa last week. "There wasn't any income."

In some previous years, Rangel has reported earnings from the cottage. For both 2004 and 2005, he listed rental income of $2,500 to $5,000 a year. For 2001, 2002 and 2003, he reported rental income of $5,000 to $15,000 a year. And in 1990, 1991 and 1992, he reported that he earned up to $5,000 per year in rent. For some years, benefactors such as American Airlines paid for Rangel's trip to the resort.

Rangel refused to answer further questions about his investment, saying, "I think that's a private matter."

September 03, 2008 in Current Affairs | Permalink